Question 26:  How did Christ, being the Son of God, become man?

Christ, the Son of God became man by taking to himself a true body and a reasonable soul. He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit in the womb of the Virgin Mary, and was born of her, yet without sin.

 

DAY 1:  Luke 1:31, 35; Colossians 2:9

                The context for Luke chapter one is the announcement of the birth of two boys.  The first was to be John the Baptist.  He was to be the herald or forerunner of the latter.  He would also be his cousin and six months older than the other.  The second was to be Jesus Christ, who would save His people from their sins (Matt. 1:21).  The angel tells both parents what to name their children.  While John means, “Jehovah is a gracious giver”, Jesus means, “Jehovah is salvation”.  One had the task of preparing the people for the Lord (Luke 1:17), the other was the Lord Himself in the midst of the people (John 1:14).

                The contrast between the conception, birth and nature of these two babies that were to be born were diametrically opposed.  While John was conceived by the sexual relationship between his mother and father and thereby obtained a sinful nature, Jesus was conceived of the Holy Spirit in the womb of Mary with both a divine nature and a human nature.  He did not receive a sinful nature.  This is important because some have suggested that God must have taken on a physical body and had a sexual relationship with Mary.  Not only is that not within the character or nature of God, it’s also not in the text.  Mary is, however, wondering how she will conceive since she has not had intercourse with a man (34).  The angel then tells her that the Holy Spirit will come upon her.  The words “come upon” are a single word in Greek, “eperchomai”.  Eperchomai means “to come, to arrive. to come upon, overtake one”.  The word is used to speak of sleep, calamities, disease, and even of the Holy Spirit descending and operating in one.  It is also referenced as an enemy attacking.  We then see that the power of the Highest will overshadow her.  The word here is episkiazo.  Episkiazo means, “to throw a shadow upon, to envelop in a shadow, to overshadow”.  The Online Bible Greek lexicon says that this word “seems to have been drawn from the familiar OT idea of a cloud as symbolizing the immediate presence and power of God”.  In other words, it seems that their would be the presence and power of God with Mary at the moment of her conception.  He would not just say the words, “Let there be a baby” from far, far away.  Rather the implication is that He would be right there with Mary when by His own power He would impregnate her.

                This child must be human.  He would be the one to pay for human sin.  Therefore He must be like them.  Colossians 2:9 tells us that He didn’t throw away His divine nature, but rather kept it along with the nature of man.  He was and still is deity manifested in a body.  Though there were pharaohs and others down through history who thought they were God in the flesh, Jesus really was.  It would take one who was eternal, without sin and who was also man to pay for man’s sin.  Jesus did not become an angel to obtain redemption for fallen angels.  He became a man.  He was born of a virgin and endured all the things in life that man endures. 

                You may want to use the comment by John Piper on the last page to illustrate the mystery of the incarnation with your family.  Though it is a mystery of how it happened, we know that God has told us that it did happen.  We could almost take the idea that man has been able to perform “test tube” conceptions.  These are conceptions that take place outside the mother’s womb and then are placed inside the womb to be carried till delivery.  What would make someone think that God, the giver of life could not have brought about the same similar, yet more incredible, because He did it without the aid of man, procedure concerning His own Son?

 

DAY 2:  Heb. 2:14; 4:14; 7:26

The writer of Hebrews is set on exalting Christ.  He is determined to show that Jesus Christ is superior to anyone and anything of the Old Testament.  He is greater than Moses, Abraham, angels, and even others who were held in high esteem in Israel.  However, in this passage He speaks of Christ becoming “a little lower than the angels”.  The text implies that this state of being lower than the angels would only be temporary.  It would be for just a short amount of time.  It refers to His taking on human form.  It in no way asserts that He ceased from being God.  Quite the contrary, Jesus said that if He so desired, He could call to His Father for twelve legions of angels (Matt. 26:53).  He did not relinquish His authority, but rather submitted Himself to the authority of His Father.

                The “children” of this passage refers to those who are men.  They are flesh and blood.  They have the physical bodies.  The physical body has the capacity for death.  Thus Jesus Christ took on the “flesh and blood”.  He did not have a heavenly body, nor was He merely a spirit appearing in time.  He had a real body like ours.  It was subject to the very things we are:  pain, suffering, sweat, energy, infirmities, etc.

                Christ’s body was given to him for a single purpose.  That purpose was to deliver it up to be killed.  The writer proclaims that it was through death that He would destroy the power of death, speaking of the devil.  This is not to say that the devil has all power over death and men to dispense death as he pleases.  It is to say that since he was the introducer of sin to mankind, sin also brought with it the consequences of death.  Jesus was able to destroy the power of death.  The word destroy (katargeo), means, “to render idle, unemployed, inactivate, inoperative, to cause a person or thing to have no further efficiency to deprive of force, influence, power, to cause to cease, put an end to, do away with, annul, abolish”.  Jesus by physical death was able to destroy the power of Satan.

                Not only is He the destroyer of the power of death, but He is also our great High Priest.  The inference here is that He is superior to the priestly line of the Levites.  The Greek literally reads that He is our Mega Chief Priest.  He is also referenced as having passed through the heavens.  Therefore, He is not one offering sacrifices for us here on earth, but Hebrews goes on to say that He offered one sacrifice and sat down.  His work is accomplished and now He intercedes on our behalf, not from earth, but in heaven.  Therefore, we should be diligent to continue in the faith or “hold fast our confession”.

Again in chapter 7, verse 26, the writer goes on to say that Christ was a fitting priest for us.  What this means is that He was like us in every way, but without sin.  An angel could not have been our priest, because they have not experienced things the way we have.  Christ did.  He took on a human body.  He endured life as we know it.  He knew what it was like to work hard, to sweat, to hunger, to thirst, to have close friends, to see loved ones die, to be persecuted, and to be tempted.  Yet Christ was able to overcome all these things and not sin.

                The writer says that He is fitting because He is holy (hosios), harmless (akakos), undefiled (amiantos), separate from sinners (chorizo apo ho hamartolos), and higher than the heavens (hupselos ho ouranos ginomai).  Jesus is holy and this means that He is undefiled by sin.  He is apart from sinners and that which is sinful.  He is harmless.  This means that He is without guilt and that He is not a fraud.  He is undefiled.  This has to do with His nature.  Though He is a man, He does not possess the sinful nature of a man.  He does however possess a human nature and we must distinguish between the two.  He is also separate from sinners.  This has a similar meaning like holy.  This means that He is separate from sinners, but the idea of chorizo is that of a divorce that takes place between a husband and wife.  It speaks to real ethical purity.  Lastly, He is higher than the heavens.  Many theologians believe this is a reference to His exaltation.

                It was the incarnation that brought about such a great High Priest.

 

DAY 3:  John 1:14; 12:27; Matt. 26:38

                We have looked at John 1:14 in a previous lesson, so we will in passing make mention that Jesus Christ did come in the flesh.  The word (logos) that the Greeks thought was unknowable, had indeed taken human form and dwelt among humans.  But, did He merely appear to be man or was he an illusion.  This is some of the heresy that John wrote about in his epistles.  There were obviously some who were saying that God could not and would not come in the flesh.  Islam teaches such things.  It is beneath God to come in human form.  Therefore to accept Christ as the Son of God is preposterous.  John says these who hold this view are antichrist.  However, the Bible does teach that Jesus Christ, God’s Son, came in the flesh and experience the things that man experiences. 

                Though He was fully God, He was also fully man.  We see in John 12:27 that His soul was troubled by the events which were just a few hours away.  We can see both natures manifest themselves.  Jesus’ human nature is horrified by the events about to take place and so as a man He is fearful of the divine wrath which He is about to endure.  He is also not expectant of the humiliation of the crowd that He will have to endure.  Yet, He is steadfast in  His thinking that it was for this very humiliation, endurance of God’s wrath and all the events surrounding it that He was here for and thus able to be submissive to His Father’s will.  No sin was involved, just an honest, emotional, yet holy struggle that took place within Him.                 

                In Matthew 26:38 we see Him appealing to his disciples, his friends, to watch and pray with him.  Why?  Again, He says that His soul is troubled.  In both John 12 and here in Matthew 26, Jesus references His soul as being troubled.  The word for soul is psuche.  Psuche can reference the seat of the feelings, desires, affections, and aversions.  It also references the moral being which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death.  Did Jesus have a soul?  Absolutely.   His emotions and every fiber of His being, as it were, were stressed during this time before His crucifixion.  It even came to the point where His sweat became as great drops of blood.  Though His human nature feared what was before Him, He was willing to submit Himself to His Father’s will.  It was as if He was saying, “Father, you are leading me into this, please bring me through it”. 

                Did Jesus face real stress and real struggles?  Yes.  But He did not sin though stress was placed upon Him and though His struggle was greater than that we have ever known.  He is the Theos anthropos, the God-man.  He is our High Priest and He understands everything that we go through because He has experienced it Himself.

                I really lack the words to try to build upon this thought since I am indeed dealing with something that is a mystery, that is how God became a man and how He lived and died as a man.  Think about and discuss these things with your family and be prepared to share some of your discussions this week.

 

Scripture: Hebrews 2:14; 4:14; 7:26; Matthew 26:38; Luke 2:52; John 1:14; 12:27; Luke 1:31,35; 2:52; Colossians 2:9.

Comment: I am typing this on a Personal Computer. I have virtually no idea how it works. That it works I am certain: I have typed hundreds of sermons on it. So it is with the "incarnation"--the "how" is (as the old theologians used to say) "ineffable". We believe it because the Scriptures teach it and because it "works" to make sense out of God's whole redemptive plan.