And I have loved thee, Ocean!
And my joy of youthful sports was on thy
breast
To be borne like thy bubbles, onward
From a boy I wantoned with thy breakers
They to me were a delight
And if the freshening sea made them a
terror
Twas a pleasing fear
For I was as it were a child of thee
And trusted to thy billows far and near
And laid my hand upon thy mane – as I do
here
— Lord Byron
ll
my life I have loved water and most all
water sports. Just this week, I bruised my
rib surfing in the Atlantic Ocean. I
absolutely love to be in the water.
When walking by a stream, there is something
so magnetic that I cannot help but look at
it constantly. When I was twelve, my father
and I built a Kayak and we paddled and swam
in the Pacific Ocean, behind Glen Canyon
Dam, the Colorado River, and the Salton Sea.
Lake or creek, pond or tributary, ocean or
sea, I love them all. You can imagine why
water baptism means so much to me. The
cleansing waves washing over are always
deeply symbolic. The statement, “out of his
innermost being shall flow rivers of living
water (John 7:37), strikes me to the soul
because of my love for water.
Problem: this love for water has caused
me conflict because of the common attire
that is worn. Water activities are engaged
either in bikinis or with bare chests.
So why does this have to be a problem?
Some would say, “Scott you have changed, why
the change?” So, let’s answer the question.
What has caused me to re-think bikini clad
girls and bare chested boys swimming in my
lake. There are at least five things that
have caused the change.
1. A Biblical Understanding of History
2. A Biblical Understanding on Modesty
3. A Biblical Understanding of Clothing
4. A Biblical Understanding of Nakedness
5. A Biblical Understanding of Temptation
Understanding the times is a Christian
virtue. And, viewing the flow of history,
through a biblical filter, is the way that
history should be understood. So, a few
years ago I read a book by Jeff Pollard,
Christian Modesty and the Public Undressing
of America, where he documents a
historical perspective on modesty. Among
other things, the book chronicles the
reasons for the drift away from modesty in
the last one hundred years.
Over the last hundred years, we have had,
as Jeff Pollard has said, “The public
undressing of America.”. What was illegal in
clothing 100 years ago, and would cause your
arrest, is now popular and accepted
everywhere — even in churches.
1890’s: Swimwear was modified street
clothing
1910: Arms were exposed
1920: You would be arrested if you appeared
in a modest 21st century
bathing suit
1920’s: Legs and backs were exposed
1930’s: Cleavage was exposed and men began
to swim bare chested
1935: Two piece bathing suits appeared with
a small break between upper and lower half
1940’s: New fabrics appeared which hugged
the body
1960’s: Navels were exposed
Today: Anything goes... One piece suits
with fabrics like skin that really leaves
nothing to the imagination and bikinis of
various categories prevail as normal.
Today, the fashions are so pervasively
broadcast over every media outlet that
everyone dresses the same when they swim.
Movies and TV have so popularized nakedness,
that if you challenge it, you are not
thought of as being very accepting. In fact,
if you do cover your body it seems odd.
Jeff Pollard says it this way, “Fashion
designers have used swimwear to undress
America.” Who can deny this? It is as
obvious as a fly on your nose.
So it is time to shout it out with
perfect clarity: “The empress has no
clothes!”. For the last two generations we
have been told that swimwear is about
fashion. They say, “Fashion is neutral.
Don’t criticize fashion, it is only
fashion.” No! It is public nakedness.
My evaluation of the modern bathing suit
is that it is nakedness thinly veiled. And,
they are not appropriate for public display.
My solution is to cover them up with shorts
or some kind of top that keeps private the
details.
I have come to the place where I am not
willing to continue in the direction our
culture has taken us. We have followed the
styles further than we should have. We have
slowly arrived at the place where we are
“ok” with our daughters and wives wearing
less than underwear in public.
As popular dress exposes nakedness it
should be rejected, as it is rejected at the
Brown’s lake. I am not willing to keep
following fashion.
The 1983 version of Webster’s dictionary
describes modesty in this way:
Behaving according to a standard of what
is proper or decorous; decent; pure;
now, especially not displaying ones
body.
Webster is helpful, but Scripture speaks
with divine authority regarding modesty. In
this case, the scriptural understanding is
consistent with Webster’s.
I Timothy 2:9-10 makes it clear that God
has something to say about how women dress.
He is interested in both your appearance and
your heart. He is not only interested in
your heart. It is not truthful to say that
God does not care how you dress, as long as
your heart is right. These verses make it
clear that appearance is important.
Most American Christians do not want
anyone to talk about how to dress, but here
in this passage of scripture, God is telling
the people in the church of Ephesus how to
dress.
When it comes to dress, Americans are
under the nurture and admonition of popular
magazines and Hollywood movies. The media
has become the jury and judge for matters of
dress, displacing the clear teaching of
scripture.
A. Orderly Clothing – “Kosmeo’ – Order
We get our word, cosmetics from this
word. It means to, “To adorn, arrange, put
in order.” It implies harmonious orderly
arrangement, instead of rumpled,
uncoordinated chaos.
B. Modest Clothing –‘Aidos”
Shamefacedness
This describes the state of mind that
governs dress: respectful timidity, not
showy, honoring others, not attracting
attention. It is a blend of modesty and
humility.
George Knight explains the meaning of
“shamefacedness” in this way:
Reverence, awe, respect for the
feeling or opinion of others or for
one’s own conscience and to shame,
self-respect... sense of honour. That
habitual self government with it’s
constant reign on all it’s passions and
desires, which would hinder the
temptation from arising... — George
Knight, Commentary on Ephesians, P134
William Hendrickson suggests that
shamefacedness ‘indicates a sense of shame,
a shrinking from trespassing the boundaries
of propriety.” — William Hendrickson, New
Testament Commentary, p106
I don’t think many people could argue
very effectively against the idea that we
have lost a sense of shame regarding dress.
It is harder and harder to find clothing
that allows modesty. Why, because it is not
fashionable to dress modestly as evidenced
by a review of the clothing seen in the
public in our land. They are places of
revealing, not modest clothing.
C. Moderate Clothing - “Sophrosunes”, or
Understatement
This word calls for “soundness of mind,
self control, passions and desires, a self
control which holds the reins over
Propriety” It is a word that implies
moderation; humility; without shame;
honorable to God; self control; hating sin.
This sets modesty in opposition to
elaborate hairstyles and expensive clothing.
In summary there are at least two areas
that Paul is addressing for the men and
women in the church. As Paul exposes some
specific types of apparel that are familiar
to all of his hearers, he is forbidding this
kind of apparel among believers. So I will,
here in the 21st century, do the
same for us. It is appropriate for me to
take the principles that Paul has given and
compare them to the popular experience.
Paul is forbidding the imitation of
worldly fashion in two specific areas:
1. Sensual/Sexually explicit
2. Ostentatious/Expensive
All women’s clothing whether on land or
sea should not call out “fashion, sex,
pride”, but it should call out “God, purity,
humility.”
Paul wants to motivate the women in
Ephesus to re-examine their dress because
they lived among pagan Greeks who glorified
the exposure of the human body. This is
exactly what we should do today, even though
this places us at odds with the culture, as
it did with the Ephesian believers. But what
is despised by the world is often acceptable
to God.
If you look at what scripture says about
clothing, you find that clothing is meant
for covering the body, not revealing it.
Scripture tells us that sin is the reason
for the need to clothe the body. Since the
fall, we are no longer naked and unashamed.
Genesis 3:7 And the eyes of them both
were opened, and they knew that they
were naked; and they sewed fig leaves
together, and made themselves aprons.
Genesis 3:10 And he said, I heard thy
voice in the garden, and I was afraid,
because I was naked; and I hid myself.
Genesis 3:21 “Also for Adam and his
wife the Lord made tunics of skin, and
clothed them.” The word “tunics” is
translated in other places “coats” or
“garments” and they usually refer to
clothing that completely covers the
body.
Scripture adequately answers the
question, “Why Clothing”? The answer, ‘To
cover nakedness.”
But if you go to the shopping malls to
look for clothing and walk the streets and
the beaches to see what folks were wearing,
you would think that the purpose of clothing
was to reveal your body to excite and entice
men, not cover it. The predominance of tight
shirts, halter tops, string bikinis, tube
tops, mini skirts, belly shirts, swimwear,
and athletic clothing tell the story quite
effectively.
The joys of swimming or opportunities for
participation in certain types of athletics
are not adequate reasons to ignore God’s
purpose for clothing. But, there are hosts
of people in our churches who think that if
you are swimming or competing in track and
field, it is ok to go half naked or wear
revealing clothing.
We have done with clothing the same thing
we have done with art. It is exempt from
biblical evaluation. For example, most
everyone reveres the artistic contributions
of Michelangelo and Leonardo Da Vinci, who
are arguably the most talented painters and
sculptors in the history of mankind. Who
were these men? Their works were primarily
influenced by pagan Greek philosophy which
glorified and exposed the naked body. Under
the influence of homosexuality, they
produced some of the most adored homoerotic
sculptures and paintings of the gay
community. We call it art.
Somehow, in the evangelical community,
art and fashion have become exempt from
biblical evaluation. Call naked sculpture
“art”, and modern swimwear “fashion”, if you
will, but let’s just be honest and give it
the other label it deserves: public
nakedness. Unfortunately for swimwear
shoppers, public nakedness is forbidden in
the Bible.
What does the Bible say about nakedness?
We know that we are “fearfully and
wonderfully made.” We know that we are made
in “the image of God.” The human body is
obviously a marvel. God Himself invented sex
and the joys of marital nakedness. We know
that the Song of Solomon glorifies the shape
of a man and a woman. But, do we find
encouragement for the public unclothed
display of the human body? Do we find
examples of a favorable view of public
nakedness? Do we find a record of godly
artists depicted in scripture who display
the naked human form in a favorable light?
No!
When you look up the instances of the
word “naked” or “nakedness” you find a
certain approach and attitude that should
shape our view. Here are a few passages that
give the right approach.
Genesis 9:22 And Ham, the father of
Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father,
and told his two brethren..
Genesis 9:23 And Shem and Japheth
took a garment, and laid it upon both
their shoulders, and went backward, and
covered the nakedness of their father;
and their faces were backward, and they
saw not their father’s nakedness.
Exodus 28:42 And thou shalt make them
linen breeches to cover their nakedness;
from the loins even unto the thighs they
shall reach:
Leviticus 18:6 None of you shall
approach to any that is near of kin to
him, to uncover their nakedness: I am
the LORD.
Leviticus 18:7 The nakedness of thy
father, or the nakedness of thy mother,
shalt thou not uncover: she is thy
mother; thou shalt not uncover her
nakedness.
Exodus 32:25 And when Moses saw that
the people were naked; (for Aaron had
made them naked unto their shame among
their enemies:)
Revelation 16:15 Behold, I come as a
thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and
keepeth his garments, lest he walk
naked, and they see his shame.
It is clear that uncovering nakedness is
sinful behavior. It is shameful to reveal
the naked body. But in our culture, it is a
virtue to reveal it. The world says, “If
you’ve got it, flaunt it.” The Bible says
that nakedness should be covered and that
you should be ashamed of yourself if you
“flaunt it.” This causes us problems because
we live in a christian culture that accepts
nakedness when it is seen at the beach, when
it is displayed in a sports event, when it
is seen in the art gallery, when it is
watched in the media and when it is
displayed in the church. At least we are
being consistent.
Where did we get the idea that naked
sculptures and pictures are acceptable and
desirable? The Bible does not endorse art
with nakedness. Pagan cultures do.
Unfortunately, our Greek and Roman roots
inform in this area far more than the Bible.
We should not forget that some of our most
revered artifacts of Greek sculpture were
produced by homosexual, pagan artists.
So what about bare chestedness among men?
It is eminently more comfortable to swim
without a shirt on. However, I believe that
the principle of nakedness applies here. At
the Brown pond, I recommend wearing a
T-shirt or a surfing shirt sometimes called
a “rash guard.”, which is made of polyester
and is much more comfortable in water.
There should be a sense of shame for
distracting someone from purity. There
should be a sense of shame for having a
distracting appearance.
A woman who hates sin would have shame to
tempt in any way. This is why Jesus is so
clear about causing other people to stumble.
But whoever causes one of these
little ones who believe in Me to sin, it
would be better for him if a millstone
were hung around his neck, and he were
drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe to
the world because of offenses! For
offenses must come, but woe to that man
by whom the offense comes! If your hand
or foot causes you to sin, cut it off
and cast it from you. It is better for
you to enter into life lame or maimed,
rather than having two hands or two
feet, to be cast into the everlasting
fire. And if your eye causes you to sin,
pluck it out and cast it from you. It is
better for you to enter into life with
one eye, rather than having two eyes, to
be cast into hell fire. Take heed that
you do not despise one of these little
ones, for I say to you that in heaven
their angels always see the face of My
Father who is in heaven.
This is why we should counsel our
Christian wives and daughters to rid their
wardrobes of tight clothing and modern
bathing suits that expose the body rather
than understate it’s form.
Joshua Harris writes:
Girls, you have an equally important
role. Remember the wayward woman we
discussed earlier? Your job is to keep
your brothers from being led astray by
her charms. Please be aware of how
easily your actions and glances can stir
up lust in a guy’s mind.
You may not realize this, but we guys
most commonly struggle with our eyes. I
think many girls are innocently unaware
of the difficulty a guy has in remaining
pure when looking at a girl who is
dressed immodestly. Now I don’t want to
dictate your wardrobe, but honestly
speaking, I would be blessed if girls
considered more than fashion when
shopping for clothes. Yes, guys are
responsible for maintaining self
control, but you can help by refusing to
wear clothing designed to attract
attention to your body.
I know the world tells you that if
you have a nice body, you should show it
off. And we men have only helped feed
this mentality. But I think you can play
a part in reversing this trend. I know
many girls who would look great in
shorter skirts or tighter blouses, and
they know it. But they choose to dress
modestly. They take the responsibility
of guarding their brother’s eyes. To
these women and others like them, I’m
grateful.”
“and let us consider how we may spur
one another on toward love and good
deeds” (Hebrews 10:24) It’s time to
start seeing other people’s purity as
our responsibility. — I Kissed Dating
Goodbye, p 99
Without question, the modern swimsuit has
created a new spectator sport called girl
watching. Men understand this better than
anyone. It is incredibly distracting to have
an immodestly dressed female nearby.
So yes, I have changed my mind about
swimwear. It happened a few years ago,
particularly after I read Jeff Pollards book
and began examining the scriptures. Above
are the reasons I feel that at least in my
area of supervision, that there are
different standards of modesty than you see
on the beach and the swim parties. Biblical
teaching on modesty, clothing, nakedness,
and temptation are enough for me to be more
careful that I have been in the past.
So, here are some guidelines that I
believe are consistent with the biblical
teaching on modesty and clothing and
nakedness. So, if you are swimming here in
my domain, here are some suggestions. Women,
should wear a shirt and shorts over their
bathing suits. There should be an effort to
cover the details. For men, I ask for shirts
or some kind of upper body covering. And,
obviously, no speedos!
As Jeff Pollard has rightly said, anyone
who takes on this subject will either be
accused of being a libertine or a legalist.
I realize this and pray that all of us, in
the midst of this “wicked and perverse
generation”, will seek to be affected by the
Word of God more than anything else.